Timeline for Is it acceptable to ask a question and give an answer strictly for peer review?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2016 at 11:25 | answer | added | LSerni | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 1, 2016 at 20:05 | answer | added | tim | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 12:34 | answer | added | mgjk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 12:27 | comment | added | mgjk | There's the "Community Wiki" button on your answer. You get no points for the answer, but people can edit it. | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 12:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/725298990342889473 | ||
| Apr 26, 2016 at 20:46 | comment | added | Anders | If you are not completely wrong, but only subtly wrong, and the question does not get a lot of attention, there is a risk that you will not be peer reviewed, and gather a couple of upvotes and no criticism. If you make it clear in the question what details you are not sure about, people are more likely to pay attention to them. | |
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:24 | answer | added | WorseDoughnut | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 26, 2016 at 14:15 | comment | added | AviD Mod | It is an easy trap to fall into, isn't it though. | |
| Apr 26, 2016 at 11:22 | comment | added | Matthew Peters | Crap, you got me! | |
| Apr 25, 2016 at 21:38 | answer | added | AviDMod | timeline score: 14 | |
| Apr 25, 2016 at 21:33 | comment | added | AviD Mod | I'm disappointed you didn't post your own answer here, instead choosing to include a proposed answer in the body of the question... ;-) | |
| Apr 25, 2016 at 18:55 | history | asked | Matthew Peters | CC BY-SA 3.0 |