2 added 3 characters in body
source | link

In French, there is saying "Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille" (litteraly "With ifs, we could put Paris in a bottle") which according to my Google-fu, has the following English equivalent: "if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there’d be no work for tinker’s hands".

Personally, I think that there is already enough work and a lot yet to be done to address current, concrete risks. I used to vote to close questions which ask concrete ways to address purely speculative risks abiding by arbitrary and usually unrealistic limitations and also using arbitrary chosen means. IMHO, such questions seemare more suited onthe realms of WorldBuilding.

In French, there is saying "Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille" (litteraly "With ifs, we could put Paris in a bottle") which according to my Google-fu, has the following English equivalent: "if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there’d be no work for tinker’s hands".

Personally, I think that there is already enough work and a lot yet to be done to address current, concrete risks. I used to vote to close questions which ask concrete ways to address purely speculative risks abiding by arbitrary and usually unrealistic limitations and also using arbitrary chosen means. IMHO, such questions seem more suited on WorldBuilding.

In French, there is saying "Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille" (litteraly "With ifs, we could put Paris in a bottle") which according to my Google-fu, has the following English equivalent: "if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there’d be no work for tinker’s hands".

Personally, I think that there is already enough work and a lot yet to be done to address current, concrete risks. I used to vote to close questions which ask concrete ways to address purely speculative risks abiding by arbitrary and usually unrealistic limitations and also using arbitrary chosen means. IMHO, such questions are more the realms of WorldBuilding.

1
source | link

In French, there is saying "Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille" (litteraly "With ifs, we could put Paris in a bottle") which according to my Google-fu, has the following English equivalent: "if ifs and ands were pots and pans, there’d be no work for tinker’s hands".

Personally, I think that there is already enough work and a lot yet to be done to address current, concrete risks. I used to vote to close questions which ask concrete ways to address purely speculative risks abiding by arbitrary and usually unrealistic limitations and also using arbitrary chosen means. IMHO, such questions seem more suited on WorldBuilding.