11

The tag exists on the site. It should be an intrinsic tag (blacklisted, but treated as a site tag when evaluating incoming migrations).

Please add to this the tag too... Not sure what other variations we will find, but that's it for now.

This is a developer-only action.

| |
  • 1
    Agreed. It's kinda redundant. – user10211 Jun 4 '13 at 11:16
  • @Shog9 please see the additional tag to be removed... – AviD Jun 6 '13 at 8:41
  • @AviD I think that should be a separate thing. “Intrinsic tag” is specifically a tag that describes the whole scope of the site. information-security is unlikely to come back in a migration (it only has a handful of occurrences on SO), we can simply remove it manually. Also security-effectiveness, which isn't used meaningfully. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jun 6 '13 at 9:09
  • @Gilles I think information-security is also a null tag, nearly completely equivalent with the scope of the site, by definition. (Yes there are some areas which are tangential to infosec, or only partially venn-overlapped, but this is the default. ) – AviD Jun 6 '13 at 9:18
  • @AviD Anyway, information-security, what information-security? – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jun 6 '13 at 9:22
  • @Gilles niiiicely done. Still wouldnt want it coming back, though... If a newbie really wants a [security] tag, let them use security-theater like everybody else! – AviD Jun 6 '13 at 9:42
1

Oh hey, this was completed some time ago. The tag has been blacklisted.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .