I can understand that users might feel a little defensive about their posts and not understand edits that are made to it. In the case of this question, the OP has rolled back edits to his question twice. The edits (in full disclosure, one was mine) appear to improve the quality of the question: the title was unclear as written, contained a typo/misspelling, and formatting of the post body left much to be desired.
I feel like the edits significantly improve the question, and consequently improve the site, but obviously the user strongly doesn't want the edits to take place. I'm not going to mess with his post again, but I'm curious how others would approach it.