19

We currently have two tags for spam:

While I understand the difference between the person who sends the spam and the spam itself, that is not a meaningful distiction for a pair of tags. And taking a glance at the question, it is not reflected in their topics.

So could we perhaps merge the two or just burninate or something similar? When it comes to spam, I think that one is enough.

| |
  • 3
    Agreed, that was a complete subset - every post with [spammer] also already had [spam], so completely useless. Thanks! – AviD Apr 26 '18 at 11:22
  • 6
    @AviD Sounds like somebody was spamming tags. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Apr 26 '18 at 11:43
  • Spam, spam, spam, sausage, and spam sandwich! – NH. Apr 30 '18 at 14:39
15

AviD has turned into a synonym of . Problem solved.

| |
  • 2
    Posting this so there can be an accepted answer. – Anders Apr 26 '18 at 13:39
  • 7
    Now, we just need to make sure [ham] and [eggs] are synonyms, too. :-) – Arminius Apr 26 '18 at 14:45
  • 2
    @Arminius do you mean [ham] and [hammer]? – Tom K. Apr 27 '18 at 12:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .